1. Elementary
is about to tell the last important story it will ever tell. Or, more
accurately: Elementary may be about
to tell the last important story it can
ever tell. The threat of relapse has been looming over Sherlock’s story since season
one, but it can only be deployed effectively once. This is the last major shift
that can happen in these characters’ lives organically; after this, it’s almost
inevitable that Elementary will have
to work harder and harder to raise the stakes, as nearly all procedurals
eventually do. On the other hand, Sherlock’s relapse has the potential to be a
phenomenal story. Elementary has
always shone when it dealt with addiction, and never more so than in season
three. I am excited (and anxious) to see what happens in season four.
2. After the first half of this season’s return to
strong arc-based storytelling, the second half has been a disappointment.
Andrew’s death and Joan’s subsequent emotional upheaval were promising (if not
particularly original) narrative ground, but though Elementary never exactly abandoned that thread, it never really
went anywhere with it, either. I had hoped that Joan’s story would come to a
head in the season finale, but it was never mentioned at all, so I guess “One
Watson, One Holmes” is the end of that arc. That’s unfortunate, since it was
the clearest serialized story of the back half of season three, and without a
connection to it, Sherlock’s relapse seems to come out of nowhere. Or, not
exactly nowhere—Elementary has been laying a lot of character groundwork for it
this season, mostly while the audience was looking in the other direction—but it
does feel disconnected, which draws away from the impact of what is otherwise a
good story decision. For instance, Alfredo’s abduction would have worked a lot
better as a motivator if he’d been in more than two episodes this season.
3. Just so we’re clear, Sherlock’s relapse = the
original Holmes’ Reichenbach Falls. Obviously. I mean, the episode is called “A
Controlled Descent.” Elementary is
not the kind of show where the main characters can fake their deaths, so they
had to get metaphorical about it. I was so
sure we were going to get Moriarty when I saw the title.
4. Speaking of which: MORIARTY MORIARTY MORIARTY
MORIARTY MORIARTY. Come on, Natalie Dormer, what’s Game of Thrones giving you? Prestige? Cable salary? Awesome
clothes? Elementary can give you the
5,000 people in the world who scream in joy when they hear your voice.
5. As a standalone episode of television, “A
Controlled Descent” is good, but doesn’t break the top five of the season. (In chronological
order: “Bella,” “The Illustrious Client”/“The One That Got Away,” “For All You
Know,” “One Watson, One Holmes.”) I haven’t tried watching them back-to-back
yet, but I’d bet it’s exquisite if viewed as a distant sequel to “For All You
Know.” Together, they form a two-sided view of Sherlock-as-addict (the harm he
did to others, and the harm he and others did to himself), and provide an
emotional context for his relapse.
Great review.
ReplyDeleteI think your point 2 about Joan's story, and point 4 about Moriarty may have more tie in than it appears. Moriarty made a brief appearance via letter at the end of Joan's story mid-season. We know Moriarty is at-large; so does Sherlock. Now to the finale: Do we really believe Oscar the junkie was smart enough to be the villain he came off as in the finale? Methinks Humpty Dumpty was pushed. Or manipulated, in this case, in order to likewise manipulate Sherlock. And if Holmes caught on to that little theory as well, his behavior at the end begins to make sense, as well as falling neatly into the Reichenbach model - he fakes a fall at the end to draw Moriarty from the shadows.
ReplyDelete